Your Complete Guide To Pill Mills: What Are They, And How Might You Be Affected

This week, the White House unveiled a new national plan to deal with prescription drug abuse, a subject we have devoted considerable time to on our blog. If you haven’t checked out the 2009 CurrentTV short documentary “The OxyContin Express,” it is well worth your time (45 minutes) and really gives the lay of the land in terms of the problem, especially when it comes to pill mills.

What’s a pill mill?

A particular focus of House talks in DC have been pill mills, clinics that dispense a great deal of medication without extensive scrutiny of the patient. How can you tell a pill mill is a pill mill? Well, according to CBS News and the Miami Herald (also worth reading is this Herald piece by Fred Grimm), signs include:

  • No physical exam
  • No medical records required
  • Medical equipment may be limited to non-existent
  • Pain is treated by pills alone; no alternative treatments available
  • Pharmacy is on-site
  • You can select your own medicines
  • Large volumes of medications are dispensed
  • Medications are dispensed that, when taken together, can cause serious problems or overdose
  • Giant crowds
  • Many patients are from out-of-state or have otherwise traveled great distances
  • Cash only

Or you can tell a pill mill is a pill mill if, as Florida’s new drug czar Dave Aronberg described, “the medical clinic is located between a tattoo parlor and a pawn shop.”

The cons of pill mills

Obviously, there are many disadvantages inherent in the way pill mills conduct business. Law enforcement frequently points to pill mills as a major factor in the prescription drug street trade; you can purchase pills at a $1 price and then sell them on the street for $4 to $10 a pill, or more. At a pill mill you can get enough medication that even if it is needed, you can still turn a profit by selling some of it off. And then there are people who can go into a pain clinic on behalf of someone else and purchase pills for them, for sale or otherwise. As documented by ABC News, the practice is known as “smurfing.” Homeless people are sometimes asked to retrieve the pills from pain clinics in return for cash. A man known as “Bill” interviewed by ABC News claims “he has gone on these types of prescription drug runs upwards of 75 times” and receives about $20 per filled prescription. It is difficult to imagine that “Bill’s” prescription was even remotely legitimate.

In another bizarre turn, until recently almost anyone could operate a pain clinic. Fred Grimm at the Miami Herald in a March 5th article describes the cases of a few ex-cons who have made huge sums by operating pain clinics. In fact, a man convicted of drug trafficking, who could not run a liquor store in Florida, was able to run a series of seven pain pill franchises before being busted on February 23rd of this year. Florida law requires that you must be a licensed doctor to own a pain clinic; that law was in effect when the bust of the former drug trafficker (among other ex-cons) on February 23rd took place. Problems clearly remain.

Another aspect of the pill mill problem is the lack of medical oversight and the damage that can do to patients. Dispensing massive amounts of oxycodone is hardly a good idea, especially when opioid overdose is now the no. 2 cause of accidental death in the United States (see Dr. Jaffe at Psychology Today for more info). But dispensing massive quantities of oxycodone AND Xanax at the same time is an even more terrible idea. Still, it happens. One particular combination has caught on, earning itself the nickname of “the Houston Cocktail.” Combine hydrocodone (the active ingredient in Lorcet, Lortab, Vicodin, Norco, Zydone, and others) with the muscle relaxer soma and Valium or Xanax and obtain a “heroin-like” high.  (See Houston-based Bacoda Blogs for more detail).  You can easily fill prescriptions for at least two of these three drugs from the same pill mill at the same time. According to a doctor interviewed by Dallas News, there is “no legitimate medical reason for a doctor to prescribe all three together.”  And yet a pain clinic director in Houston prescribed this combination 3,800 times between 2006-2007.  On Jan 18th of 2011, this man, Dr. Maurice Conte, was forced to pay millions of damages to the family of a man who died from taking this combination of drugs.

The pros of pill mills

Yes, there are in fact “pros” to pill mills.  Although tons of dealers and scammers rely upon pill mills to conduct their trade, legitimate patients in actual pain need pill mills too.  Crackdowns on the pill trade have made it harder for people to obtain the pain pills they need, and made the price per pill balloon from $1 to $6.  Maintaining supplies has also been difficult for some pharmacies.  One Florida woman with debilitating back pain and a legitimate prescription had to phone 26 area pharmacies before she could finally fill her prescription (St. Petersburg Times).  Patrick Coyne MSN, APN, FAAN, testified at a House hearing last week on the behalf of the Oncology Nursing Society on the already burdensome difficulties many of his patients face in dealing with chronic pain.  You can read his 2 1/2 page testimony here (PDF).

The solution to pill mills

As of this writing, Florida does not appear to have solved its pill mill problem.  Florida is one of the few states that have held out from creating a prescription drug database that would track prescriptions and patients, and flag people whose use signals illegal trade or abuse.  Florida’s database was authorized two years ago, but has never received the funding it requires to actually be established.  Such drug databases are not unusual; at least 38 other states have them, according to Time Magazine.  These databases, known as Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (or PDMPs), will be playing a greater role in national efforts to combat prescription drug abuse announced yesterday by the White House Office of National Drug Policy (PDF here), although no national database has been established as yet and national agencies do not have oversight over any state PDMP, according to the DEA.  The extent to which this helps a state like Florida, still fighting over how and whether or not to fund its own PDMP, is unclear.

Clearly, in combating prescription drug abuse, states and the nation at large must be mindful of the needs of those in chronic pain.  If some in chronic pain are finding it possible to address their needs only through pill mills, that should be addressed so as to increase their access to pills and ensure they remain affordable.  Lower-income patients, for example, may find it necessary to pay for pills with cash, and their needs should not be neglected.  However, pill mills as they stand, in Florida and in a few remaining states like Texas, are a national scandal, that waste valuable law enforcement resources and contribute to the destruction of thousands of American lives.

- article by Robyn Schelenz

New Study Confirms Teen Drug Use Trends

A new study, released today by The Partnership at Drugfree.org and the MetLife Foundation, found a number of interesting trends in teen drug use. Some of them echo the findings of Monitoring the Future from the past year – for example, that marijuana use in teens has been trending up in the past 3 years. Rising ecstasy use was also reported. As you can see in our teen drug use infographic, marijuana use has been rising for a few years, while cigarette use is set on a downward path.

Teen marijuana use appears to be increasing, while cigarette use is continuing to decline.

(data for image taken from Monitoring the Future)

An area The Partnership/MetLife study took a particularly hard look at was underage drinking.  Drinking starts young – 62% of teens that report drinking said they had their first full drink by the age of 15.  25% of those teens had their first drink at the age of 12 or younger.

The study found that about a third of parents were unsure as to how they could prevent their teen from drinking, responding that there was very little a parent could do to stop it.  Meanwhile, a significant number of teens said that used alcohol to deal with stress in some way.  32% said they drank to forget their problems; 24% to deal with problems at home; 20% to deal with school-related pressures.  So, it would appear the idea that incidental teen alcohol use is related to parties and not other issues of self-confidence and social pressure has been debunked.

The % of teens prone to alcohol abuse is alarming, and suggests a need for better parent-teen communication on the issue.  Another issue parents and schools need to better address is teen prescription drug abuse.  The study reports that 1 in 4 teens have taken a prescription drug not prescribed to them at least once in their lives; 23% used a prescription painkiller not prescribed to them by a doctor.  11% of teens have abused cough medicine for its psychoactive effects.

Check out the study here and let us know what you think.  How should schools and parents shift their policies to adapt to these new trends?

New Infographic from Home Health Testing: Teenage Drug Trends 2011

We’ve been working hard for the last month and a half on this project, and we are finally ready to reveal our first infographic! Take a look – Drug Use in Today’s Classroom! Do you see anything that surprises you?

Teen Drug Use infographic
By: HomeHealthTesting.com

You can also check out the infographic in a larger size (both sizes are embeddable) over here at our Teen Drug Use infographic page.

The data was compiled from the 2010 Monitoring the Future study, which has examined trends in high schools since 1975.  The study follows participants from 8th grade through young adulthood.  We tried to present the statistics we saw as the most important, along with the facts singled out by Monitoring the Future, in this infographic.  We are very grateful to Principal Investigator Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D. for giving us permission to use the data and for Monitoring the Future for providing such excellent data every year.

Let us know what you think about the graphic!  What surprised you and what didn’t?  Do you have any questions or want to know the source for each fact?  Need to know how to embed the graphic on your site?  Leave a comment below or email us at cs at homehealthtesting.com and we’ll get back to you ASAP!

Spice / K2 Is Now Illegal

We wrote in January about the fact that Spice, despite popular belief, was still legal according to federal law (see Spice Still Available? for the details). Individual states (18 at the last count) had made it illegal according to state law but the majority of people in America still had access to the synthetic marijuana product Spice. Some rejoiced, some were chagrined. In fact I took note of Spice products in local stores this past month. So shop owners were exercising their rights regardless of the warning issued Nov. 24th that Spice would eventually be taken off the market. (And they may continue selling Spice products even though it’s not illegal for a number of reasons we’ll look at below).

Yesterday the DEA put its notice making Spice / k2 products illegal on the Federal Register. You can check out the full notice on the DEA website. Basically, it temporarily places five of the compounds that make Spice mimic marijuana on Schedule I (the same Schedule where marijuana and heroin reside). Those compounds are: JWH-018, JWH-073, JWH-200, CP-47,497, CP-47,497 C8 homologue. Since they are on Schedule I, the same regulations and penalties that apply to other illegal drugs on that Schedule now apply to Spice…which just yesterday was being sold in your local corner store. The law is effective as of yesterday, March 1, 2011.

The controversial products that people call "fake pot" are still on the market.

One of the products targeted by the ban

Spice is being placed on Schedule I because it has been deemed an “imminent hazard” to public safety. To do this the Attorney General had to determine “the history and current pattern of abuse,” the “scope, duration, and significance of abuse,” and the “risk there is to public health, including actual abuse, diversion from legitimate channels, and clandestine importation, manufacture or distribution.”

Some of the aspects of synthetic cannabinoids flagged in the notice include:


  • The substances were not intended for human consumption;
  • Healthcare professionals and law enforcement suggest that the substances are used for their psychoactive properties;
  • Spice/k2 compounds are associated with adverse health effects;
  • No non-research related legitimate use for Spice/k2, such as a therapeutic/medical use, has been found;
  • There is no evidence that their addiction to incense products adds any value, as the substances have no odor [one of the aspects Spice smokers most liked about the product - Ed. note];
  • There have been very few clinical investigations of Spice / k2 so there is almost no information regarding the pharmacology, toxicology and safety of the product;
  • The cannabinoids are manufactured overseas or in private homes without any regulation or quality control;
  • The packaging is also without regulation or quality control.

The other thing about the packaging is that it is a bit reminiscent of cigarette packaging, before the many regulations were passed to prevent tobacco companies from advertising to kids.  Although the DEA does not explicitly come out and say this, there is a concern that the way they are packaged is suggestive of their inappropriate use and of their psychoactive properties.

So, Spice is now illegal.  While we knew it was coming, the notice may leave us with more questions than it does answers.  For example, have shop owners been notified?  How are they supposed to dispose of the product (David Kroll goes into that and similar questions in his blog entry “6 Big Questions on the DEA Ban of K2 Spice Synthetic Marijuana “Fake Pot” Compounds”)?  The notice explains that the five compounds and their isomers are targeted by the law…but does that include all the possible synthetic cannabinoids available?  Finally, spice drug testing is now available, and will soon be coming to the home market as well (in fact we will be carrying home drug test kits from Confirm Biosciences very soon), but is detection technology advanced and ubiquitous enough to be effective?  Some states (such as Massachusetts) have passed laws to decriminalize marijuana, presumably to avoid applying valuable resources to a very commonly used drug.  How will police departments have to change procedure or adapt resources to deal with this notice?

In any case, this story will no doubt continue to develop.  But the word is out, for shop owners and consumers alike – as of yesterday, you have to stay away from Spice.

Picture of K2 varieties from “The Pitch”

Will A Shotgun of Marijuana Show Up On A Drug Test / Screen?

We’ve been getting a lot of questions lately about “shotgun” hits of marijuana.  People want to know if they will show up on a drug test.  The short answer is yes.

A potted pot plant.

A marijuana plant.

First, what are shotgun hits of marijuana?  A shotgun is when you inhale marijuana and then exhale it into someone else’s mouth.  If you are the one taking the second inhale, or in other words the person inhaling from someone else’s mouth, you are the one receiving the shotgun.

So you might wonder, “okay, I didn’t directly take a hit.  Maybe it won’t show up on the test.”  Or, “Maybe it’s like second hand smoke.”  But…

Actually taking a shotgun hit is like taking a very concentrated hit – it’s comparable to taking a bong hit as opposed to smoking a joint.  It’s very potent and contains a lot of THC.  Second hand smoke is just ambient – the THC dissipates into the air rapidly.  That’s why second hand smoke doesn’t appear on a marijuana drug test.

Regardless of whether you are inhaling from a joint, paraphernalia, or someone else’s mouth, if you are intentionally inhaling marijuana smoke and/or getting high, you are probably going to show up on a urine drug screen for marijuana.

For more reading please check out Does Secondhand Marijuana Smoke Show Up On A Drug Test.  Or check out our marijuana drug test kit product page.  Our test is used by companies all over the USA to screen employees for marijuana use and meets suggested initial testing levels.  For those who wish to test themselves or others, it’s a good choice.

Couch Potatoes and Heart Disease

A new study in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology set out to find if prolonged sitting was linked to cardiovascular diseases.  Actually the doctors called the study “Screen-Based Entertainment Time, All-Cause Mortality, and Cardiovascular Events” where “screen based entertainment” is more commonly known as TV and or computer – leave it to doctors to come up with a title like that.

After following 4,512 Scottish people from 2003 to 2007 and recording their screen viewing time and their health, Emmanuel Stamatakis, PhD, MSc, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, United Kingdom said:

“People who spend excessive amounts of time in front of a screen — primarily watching TV — are more likely to die of any cause and suffer heart-related problems.  Our analysis suggests that two or more hours of screen time each day may place someone at greater risk for a cardiac event.”

The study found that those people who spent two or more hours per day in front of a screen for leisure activities were double the risk of heart attack or other cardiac event compared with those who spent less sedentary time in front of a screen.  Those in the study who had four or more hours of screen time were fifty percent more likely to die of any cause.  One surprising fact in the study was that it did not matter if they were physically active for several other hours in the week in other words exercise in addition to being a couch potato did not improve the heart health of those in this study.

According to Doctor Emmanuel Stamatakis approximately 25% of the association between screen time and cardiovascular disease events was explained collectively by C-reactive protein.  Extended periods of sitting may cause high levels of low-grade inflammation which can lead to heart disease.  A marker of low-grade inflammation called C reactive protein or CRP was about three times higher in the study participants who spent the most time sitting in front of a screen.

While the study covered recreational screen time since that was the easiest for people to have a choice in, Dr. Stamatakis mentioned that people with jobs that require extended sitting and screen time should take breaks and short walks throughout the day.