More Adults Have HIV in Washington, D.C. Than Rwanda

Although we sometimes think of HIV/AIDS as a global problem, it’s important to shine a light back on how it affects us at home. The New England Journal of Medicine recently revealed that 1 in 30 adults in Washington, D.C. are infected with HIV – a greater prevalence than the rates in Ethiopia, Rwanda, or Nigeria.

There are many countries with less serious HIV/AIDS problems than the US.

There are many countries with less serious HIV/AIDS problems than the US. According to the New England Journal of Medicine, Washington, D.C. would fall in the 2 to 5 percent range, the first shade of brown/red. Click to expand.

What is the solution to this dilemma? According to Brad Ogilvie of the Mosaic Initiative, the answer is to get tested.

In an article by Jennifer Grant in the Chicago Tribune, Ogilvie describes the mission and strategy of his organization.  Their goals are to ensure everyone knows their HIV status and to expand home testing from the FDA Approved blood tests (that we currently carry) to other types of test, including a saliva test.  This would make the cost of getting an HIV self test only $8 instead of $50.  The technology is available and put to use in clinics each day but such tests are just not available over the counter yet.

Why aren’t these tests available over the counter?  This question has caused some frustration among HIV/AIDS activists such as Ogilvie.  The primary reasons seems to be concern that a person might self test incorrectly.  Here is a list from The Body of the conditions that are placed on the sale of rapid HIV tests:

“1. Sale is restricted to clinical laboratories that have

  • an adequate quality assurance program, including planned systematic activities to provide adequate confidence that requirements for quality will be met, and
  • where there is assurance that operators will receive and use the instructional materials.”
  • 2. The test is approved for use only by an agent of a clinical laboratory.
    3. Test subjects must receive a “Subject Information” pamphlet and pre-test counseling prior to specimen collection and appropriate counseling when test results are provided.
    4. The test is not approved for use to screen blood, cell, plasma, or tissue donors.”

Do you think that sales should continue to be restricted? Or should such tests be available in the home market? Let us know what you think and remember that you can still obtain anonymous HIV testing with a home HIV test today.

One single comment

  1. […] parts of the US the incidence level of HIV is higher than it is in some African countries (see: “More Adults Have HIV in Washington, D.C. than Rwanda”). It doesn’t have to be this way – take an easy to do HIV test this weekend. Fight the […]